Pilot project for a search for more astrometric calibrators using
the wide field fringe search technique
Objectives of the campaign
In the past, the list of bright compact sources detected at VLA and/or MERLIN
served as a pool for candidates for VLBI Calibrator surveys. Almost all these
objects have been already observed with the VLBA. Since the VLBA Calibrator
list is complete at the 150—200 mJy level, new calibrators are
relatively faint objects. Most all-sky surveys at frequencies higher than
2 GHz are either incomplete and/or not deep enough. As a result, information
about spectral indexes is sparse and unreliable. For this reason, it is more
difficult to find remaining flat spectrum good candidate sources.
The fainter the source is, the less reliable information about its spectral
index is, if it is available at all. Although the majority of flat spectrum
sources from the NVSS are AGNs, in general, it is not possible to deduce the
estimate of the correlated flux
density at baselines of ∼ 1000 km from the flux density at VLA baselines.
A source with correlated flux density 5 mJy is not useful as a calibrator
for many applications, but a source with flux density 30—100 mJy
is useful.
We are going to exploit the unique
capability of the JIVE correlator that is able to provide the
highest output rate in the world, and that allows us to use the ultra-wide
window for fringe search. This will increase the detection rate up to 10%.
New candidates to calibrators were found by analyzing 193 radioastronomical
catalogues using the CATS database. The database includes NVSS, CLASS,
CRATES \citep{crates} and others. We selected 854 sources which
satisfy the following criteria:
- are with declinations in range [+53° +75°];
- were not observed previously with VLBI;
- have at least two measurements of flux density that allow estimation
of their spectral index at frequencies higher than 1~GHz.
- have single-dish flux density extrapolated to 8.6 GHz > 50mJy;
- have spectral index α flatter than -0.5
(S ∼ να).
According to our previous experience, the list of candidate sources selected
by this way may contain up to 50% extended sources that are not detectable
with VLBI.
One of the the most economic modes of making sources survey is to observe
them in a ring zones in order to minimize losses for slewing. We selected the
zone of interest with δ ∈ [+53° +75°],
area of 1.02 srad. There is nothing specific in the selected declination zone,
we picked with zone for facilitating scheduling.
We propose to exploit the much higher sensitivity of the EVN with respect to
other VLBI arrays and to screen the list of candidates. One scan of 70 seconds
long is sufficient to determine whether the source (or sources) has a compact
component at milliarcsecond scales with the correlated flux density more than
10 mJy at baselines which include Effelsberg and with the correlated flux
density more than 30 mJy at other baselines.
The goal was to test the proposed method and check the feasibility of such
an approach, its efficiency to find new compact sources, to check if the
observing setup and strategy are optimal. In particular, we were interested in
answering the following questions:
- How much observing time is required for finding calibrators down
to a certain correlator flux density in a specified zone? What is
the detection rate?
- Whether the selection cutoff for flux density and the spectral
index should be adjusted?
- Is it feasible to sustain data processing of a 24 hour experiment
using the ultra-wide search window?
People
Team members (in alphabetic order):
- Yury Kovalev
Max Planck Inst. fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany
- Leonid Petrov
ADNET Systems, Inc./NASA GSFC, USA
Observations:
The table of 375 observed target sources and
their coordinates.
Preliminary results:
In total, 390 sources were obseved: 375 targets and 15 amplitude calibrators.
Among then all, 338 targets, and 15 calibrators have been detected.
Detection rate is 90%.
The table of estimates of correlated flux density among 353 detected sources
is availble in both plain ascii text format
and in html format. Errors in estimates
are considered to have error no exceeding 15%.
Estimates of the SEFD and its adjustments
Station: EFLSBERG SEFD_zen: 17. -+ 2. Jy Adj: 0.808 -+ 0.005
Station: JODRELL2 SEFD_zen: 355. -+ 10. Jy Adj: 0.890 -+ 0.007
Station: MEDICINA SEFD_zen: 135. -+ 7. Jy Adj: 0.757 -+ 0.006
Station: NOTO SEFD_zen: 764. -+ 316. Jy Adj: 1.270 -+ 0.009
Station: ONSALA60 SEFD_zen: 1097. -+ 10. Jy Adj: 1.119 -+ 0.015
Station: TORUN SEFD_zen: 185. -+ 7. Jy Adj: 0.954 -+ 0.007
Back to VLBI calibrators web page.
This page was prepared by Leonid Petrov
(
)
Last update: 2009.02.08_21:31:00