Dear colleagues,
Please find the second revision of the proposal at
ftp://lacerta.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/for_lcs/lba_dec2008_rev2.tex
ftp://lacerta.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/for_lcs/LBA_Calibrator_Survey-2_rev2.xml
ftp://lacerta.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/for_lcs/LBA_Calibrator_Survey-2_rev2.pdf
I've made corrections suggested by Alessandra, Chris, and Sergei. My
wife suggested to change colors of the plot. Sigh. I did it as well.
"Although the main purpose of the proposed experiments is community
service, these obser-
vations will also address long-term scientific goals of proposers for
creation of a homogeneous
flux limited sample of compact sources. The sample will allow to
investigating various statis-
tics."
I really did not follow this. You should certainly as a little more
about what sort of statistics your are going to investigate. The
I reworded that part. One of the complaints of reviewers to our
previous VLBA Survey proposals was that we offered no science.
That is why I tried to add a scientific justification of these observations.
Table 1. It is not clear to me how the Northern calibrator list can
have less sources but higher probability of finding a close by
calibrator.
I remade this table using 2008b_astro catalogue. The numbers changed
slightly. The distribution of compact radio sources is far from uniform,
partly due to a bias in candidate selection, partly due to a large scale
irregularities in the structure of the Universe. By the way, the study of
these irregularities is the major motivation of conducting calibrators
surveys for me.
I will submit the proposal tomorrow, on Sunday, 2008.12.14. Please send
me your comments as soon as possible.
Leonid
13-DEC-2008 13:03:42