[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LCS-2 proposal. The second draft.
Dear colleagues,
Please find the second revision of the proposal at
ftp://lacerta.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/for_lcs/lba_dec2008_rev2.tex
ftp://lacerta.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/for_lcs/LBA_Calibrator_Survey-2_rev2.xml
ftp://lacerta.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/for_lcs/LBA_Calibrator_Survey-2_rev2.pdf
I've made corrections suggested by Alessandra, Chris, and Sergei. My
wife suggested to change colors of the plot. Sigh. I did it as well.
> "Although the main purpose of the proposed experiments is community
> service, these obser-
> vations will also address long-term scienti�c goals of proposers for
> creation of a homogeneous
> �ux limited sample of compact sources. The sample will allow to
> investigating various statis-
> tics."
>
> I really did not follow this. You should certainly as a little more
> about what sort of statistics your are going to investigate. The
I reworded that part. One of the complaints of reviewers to our
previous VLBA Survey proposals was that we offered no science.
That is why I tried to add a scientific justification of these observations.
> Table 1. It is not clear to me how the Northern calibrator list can
> have less sources but higher probability of finding a close by
> calibrator.
I remade this table using 2008b_astro catalogue. The numbers changed
slightly. The distribution of compact radio sources is far from uniform,
partly due to a bias in candidate selection, partly due to a large scale
irregularities in the structure of the Universe. By the way, the study of
these irregularities is the major motivation of conducting calibrators
surveys for me.
I will submit the proposal tomorrow, on Sunday, 2008.12.14. Please send
me your comments as soon as possible.
Leonid
13-DEC-2008 13:03:42
Archive of LCS project forum
list_lcs@mail.astrogeo.org Message 00035